And example of a noob's extreme is a flat level by just pushing forward to win. An example of the Pro's extreme is having a map that strictly for wall jumpers and if you mess up, you fall to your death. Without balance, the map will be boring or useless. By having balance of both an easy map and a map that pros can exploit shows a good transformice map. Pros are given an advantage by wall jumping to key locations or timing things perfectly example. However, what separates a good map from a bad map is how the pros are able to take advantage of these maps. This is why we all continued to play the game, instead of giving up after the first map. There are a few tricky ones, but overall, any starter shouldn't have trouble completing them. In essence, putting a rotating plank next to a anvil snake while everything is jumping on trampolines on ice, is not simple.ĭifficulty: Most of the original transformice maps are not difficult. Adding different color grounds, is a form of adding more obstacles. All these maps have one main obstacle (reoccurring or not). I think we can agree they are straight forward. If we look at the original maps you will notice they are not complicated. Simplicity: Transformice is based off of simple maps. I am open for discussion and criticism, but hear me out for the following:
I am writing this to see what attributes makes up a perfect transformice map. Great maps are getting low ratings, while crummy maps are getting high ratings. I am creating this reddit page because I am shocked at some of the ratings these maps are getting.
0 kommentar(er)
